![](\"https:\/\/a57.foxnews.com\/cf-images.us-east-1.prod.boltdns.net\/v1\/static\/694940094001\/1d1b54ea-0346-4126-8443-cc3bf122eea0\/51305ff9-3a60-46c1-9ae6-3ff8c7325a6e\/1280x720\/match\/931\/524\/image.jpg?ve=1&tl=1\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
But Trump trial may dominate coverage.<\/p>\n
Any predictions about how the establishment media will go soft now that the Democrats are back in the White House might sound like an advertisement featuring the character Captain Obvious. Anyone who remembers the Obama years and the Clinton years can guess the changes in the media that are coming. <\/p>\n
Let\u2019s make a list: <\/p>\n
1. No rewards for Jim Acosta screaming at the White House press briefing.<\/strong><\/p>\n When a Republican president briefs reporters, he knows that about 99 percent of the room voted for his Democrat opponent. A Democratic president also knows it. <\/p>\n During the 2020 presidential campaign, the tone of reporters asking questions of candidate Joe Biden had all the ferocity of a rerun of “Barney & Friends.” To call some of these questions “softballs” is an insult to softballs. Even if we are treated to a firm question from say, ABC\u2019s Jonathan Karl, it will be polite. (And most likely, given our experience under Obama, ABC will skip the exchange on their newscasts.)<\/p>\n KATIE COURIC’S ‘CONDESCENDING, ELITIST’ REMARKS CALLING TO ‘DEPROGRAM’ GOP RETIRES JOURNO LABEL, CRITICS SAY<\/strong><\/p>\n 2. No serious interest in the financial finagling of the president\u2019s siblings and children.<\/strong><\/p>\n Everyone knows how much the media detested a focus on Hunter Biden\u2019s lucrative lobbying in China and Ukraine. It had to be “misinformation” before anyone looked at it. <\/p>\n Given the media\u2019s toothless approach during the campaign, many people don\u2019t know about the financial manipulations of Biden\u2019s brothers James and Frank, or Biden\u2019s son-in-law Howard Krein, who married his daughter Ashley. Consult the media\u2019s lack of interest in the cash-grabs of Hillary\u2019s brothers Tony Rodham and Hugh Rodham for past evidence. <\/p>\n CLICK HERE TO GET THE OPINION NEWSLETTER<\/strong><\/p>\n 3. No appetite for president-trashing anonymous quotes from “senior administration officials.”<\/strong> <\/p>\n The major papers couldn\u2019t get enough of anonymous sources gossiping about the craziness behind the scenes from 2016 on, especially their own favorite cockeyed conspiracy theories, like Trump sharing national secrets with the Russians.<\/p>\n The New York Times even published an op-ed by “Anonymous,” whom they claimed was a “senior administration official.” It turned out it was the unknown Homeland Security chief of staff Miles Taylor, who was so celebrated he even got a big-money book deal as “Anonymous.”<\/p>\n 4. No appetite for president-trashing “Tell All” books from former officials or former friends or family members. <\/strong> <\/p>\n The book publishing industry is like a slow-motion version of the liberal media. They have all the same ideological reflexes and the same desires on who they should tout and who they should ruin. From Omarosa to Anthony Scaramucci to Mary Trump, publishers could count on bitter Democrats to leap on every gossipy morsel.<\/p>\n The same goes for newspaper bigfoots like Bob Woodward, who will probably hesitate on a Biden book in favor of a book on some business titan….like Jeff Bezos. (As if.) <\/p>\n![](\"https:\/\/cf-images.us-east-1.prod.boltdns.net\/v1\/static\/694940094001\/c88298d0-082e-4982-8df9-0f1fe9731ebf\/ed8ed99b-9690-4506-a0c9-0321ae6e6f3f\/1280x720\/match\/image.jpg\")
<\/p>\n