LONDON (Reuters) – South Africa halted Monday\u2019s planned rollout of AstraZeneca\u2019s COVID-19 vaccinations after data showed it gave minimal protection against mild infection from one variant, stoking fears of a much longer cat-and-mouse battle with the pathogen.<\/p>\n
The coronavirus has killed 2.3 million people and turned normal life upside down for billions but new variants have raised fears that vaccines will need to be tweaked and people may have to have booster shots.<\/p>\n
Researchers from the University of Witwatersrand and the University of Oxford said in a prior-to-peer analysis that the AstraZeneca vaccine provided minimal protection against mild or moderate infection from the South African variant among young people.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis study confirms that the pandemic coronavirus will find ways to continue to spread in vaccinated populations, as expected,\u201d said Andrew Pollard, chief investigator on the Oxford vaccine trial.<\/p>\n
\u201cBut, taken with the promising results from other studies in South Africa using a similar viral vector, vaccines may continue to ease the toll on health care systems by preventing severe disease.\u201d<\/p>\n
Britain and Australia urged calm, citing evidence that the vaccines prevented grave illness and death, while AstraZeneca said it believed its vaccine could protect against severe disease.<\/p>\n
But if vaccines do not work as effectively as hoped against new and emerging variants, then the world could be facing a much longer – and more expensive – battle against the virus than previously thought.<\/p>\n
The AstraZeneca vaccine was the big hope for Africa as it is cheap and easier to store and transport than the Pfizer shot, making South Africa\u2019s move a major blow, with sweeping implications for other regions.<\/p>\n
The so called South African variant, known by scientists as 20I\/501Y.V2 or B.1.351, is the dominant one in South Africa and is circulating in 41 countries around the world including the United States.<\/p> Other major variants include the so-called UK variant, or 20I\/501Y.V1, and the Brazilian variant known as P.1.<\/p>\n An analysis of infections by the South African variant showed there was only a 22% lower risk of developing mild-to-moderate COVID-19 if vaccinated with the AstraZeneca shot versus those given a placebo.<\/p>\n Protection against moderate-severe disease, hospitalisation or death could not be assessed in the study of around 2,000 volunteers who had a median age of 31 as the target population were at such low risk, the researchers said.<\/p>\n While thousands of individual changes have arisen as the virus mutates on replication and evolves into new variants, only a tiny minority are likely to be important or change the virus in an appreciable way, according to the British Medical Journal.<\/p>\n While the lead investigator on the trial said that recent data indicated that protection against severe disease was likely from the vaccine, the study raised the prospect of repeated vaccination against a changing virus.<\/p>\n Professor Shabir Madhi, lead investigator on the AstraZeneca trial in South Africa, said the vaccine\u2019s similarity to another produced by Johnson & Johnson, which reduced severe disease by 89%, suggested it would still prevent serious illness or death.<\/p>\n \u201cThere\u2019s still some hope that the AstraZeneca vaccine might well perform as well as the Johnson & Johnson vaccine in a different age group demographic that I address of severe disease,\u201d he told BBC radio.<\/p>\n Sarah Gilbert, professor of vaccinology at the University of Oxford, said efforts were under way to develop a new generation of booster shot vaccines that will allow protection against emerging variants.<\/p>\n \u201cThis is the same issue that is faced by all of the vaccine developers, and we will continue to monitor the emergence of new variants that arise in readiness for a future strain change,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n British junior health minister Edward Argar said the AstraZeneca vaccine prevents death and serious illness and is effective against the main variants of the virus in the United Kingdom, though people may have to have a booster shot as it mutates.<\/p>\n He echoed Australia which is expected approve the use of the AstraZeneca vaccine within days.<\/p>\n \u201cThere is currently no evidence to indicate a reduction in the effectiveness of either the AstraZeneca or Pfizer vaccines in preventing severe disease and death. That is the fundamental task, to protect the health,\u201d Health Minister Greg Hunt said.<\/p>\n Argar said just 147 people had been known to have been infected with the South African variant in Britain, though he allowed that booster shots – such as against the common flu – might be needed in future.<\/p>\n \u201cIt would just be normal, in a sense, as we did with the flu vaccine, to update it to catch anything the virus is trying to do to keep ahead of it.\u201d<\/p>\n French Health Minister Olivier Veran said he continued to support the AstraZeneca vaccine, arguing it provided sufficient protection against \u201cnearly all the variants\u201d.<\/p>\nVACCINE SHOCK<\/h2>\n
STOPS DEATH<\/h2>\n