{"id":109079,"date":"2021-03-09T17:32:30","date_gmt":"2021-03-09T17:32:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fin2me.com\/?p=109079"},"modified":"2021-03-09T17:32:30","modified_gmt":"2021-03-09T17:32:30","slug":"biden-justice-department-stops-defending-trump-rule-that-limits-benefits-for-immigrants","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fin2me.com\/politics\/biden-justice-department-stops-defending-trump-rule-that-limits-benefits-for-immigrants\/","title":{"rendered":"Biden Justice Department stops defending Trump rule that limits benefits for immigrants"},"content":{"rendered":"
The Department of Justice on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that it will no longer defend a Trump administration rule that put limits on immigrants seeking permanent U.S. residency.<\/p>\n
Trump's White House made the so-called public charge rule tougher on immigrants if they were likely to need non-cash benefits like Medicaid, food stamps or federal housing aid.<\/p>\n
The move is the latest in a series of decisions by the Justice Department after President Joe Biden took office in January to drop positions taken by the department during President Donald Trump's administration.<\/p>\n
It comes a month after the Supreme Court allowed the modification of the public charge rule to take effect while a decision on an injunction against the rule was pending in the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.<\/p>\n
It was longstanding federal policy, before Trump took office, to consider whether an immigrant was likely to need cash assistance or long-term hospitalization in determining whether to grant that person permanent residency status.<\/p>\n
The Trump administration moved to expand that definition to include non-cash benefits, such as Medicaid, which provides health coverage to primarily low-income people.<\/p>\n
A number of federal district courts around the U.S. had blocked the rule from taking effect.<\/p>\n
But the Trump administration successfully overturned those injunctions on appeal to circuit courts of appeal, and ultimately at the Supreme Court in late January.<\/p>\n