WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The number of Americans filing new claims for unemployment benefits dropped more than expected last week as layoffs subsided, with companies desperate for workers to meet surging demand unleashed by a rapidly reopening economy.<\/p>\n
The economy, which in the first quarter notched its second-fastest growth pace since the third quarter of 2003, is gaining speed, with other data on Thursday showing business spending on equipment accelerated in April. Activity is being boosted by the COVID-19 pandemic\u2019s easing grip and nearly $6 trillion in relief provided by the government over the past year.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe economy is off and running,\u201d said Scott Hoyt, a senior economist at Moody\u2019s Analytics in West Chester, Pennsylvania. \u201cGoing forward growth will be supported by the pent-up savings that households have amassed during the pandemic.\u201d<\/p>\n
Initial claims for state unemployment benefits fell 38,000 to a seasonally adjusted 406,000 for the week ended May 22, the Labor Department said. That was the lowest since mid-March 2020 and marked the fourth straight weekly decline in applications.<\/p>\n
The decrease was led by Washington state, Florida and New Jersey. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast 425,000 applications for the latest week. Though claims remain well above the 200,000 to 250,000 range that is viewed as consistent with healthy labor market conditions, they have dropped from a record 6.149 million in early April 2020.<\/p>\n
Pandemic-related restrictions on businesses have been rolled back, with more than half of adults in the United States fully vaccinated against COVID-19, leaving factories, construction sites, restaurants and bars, among many, clamoring for workers.<\/p>\n
The labor shortage, despite nearly 10 million Americans being officially unemployed, has been blamed on the safety net, strengthened during the pandemic by the government, to provide a temporary lifeline following the unprecedented economic and human carnage caused by the virus. (Graphic: Jobless claims, )<\/p>\n
Republican governors in at least 23 states, including Florida and Texas, have announced they are ending unemployment programs funded by the federal government next month, including a weekly $300 subsidy, which businesses say are discouraging the jobless from seeking work.<\/p> There is, however, no consensus that the generous unemployment benefits are keeping people home. According to JPMorgan economist Daniel Silver, an analysis of unemployment rates, wage growth and labor force participation rates in the 23 states suggested the early termination of the special benefits programs was motivated by politics rather than economics.<\/p>\n \u201cWhile some of these states have tight labor markets and strong earnings growth, many of them do not,\u201d said Silver. \u201cIt therefore looks like politics, rather than economics, is driving decisions regarding the early ends to these programs.\u201d<\/p>\n U.S. stocks were trading higher. The dollar was steady against a basket of currencies. U.S. Treasury prices fell.<\/p>\n A survey by Poachedjobs.com, a national job board for the restaurant\/hospitality industry, found most had returned to work, with a full schedule of 30-40 hours a week.<\/p>\n For others, uncertainty about future restrictions on indoor dining and fears of contracting the virus, whether they are vaccinated or not, were keeping them away.<\/p>\n Fewer than 100,000 people filed claims last week under the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA) program for the self-employed, gig workers and others who do not qualify for the regular state programs. The early termination of PUA and broadening economic re-engagement could push claims even lower and shrink the jobless rolls in the months ahead.<\/p>\n The claims report showed the number of people continuing to receive benefits after an initial week of aid dropped 96,000 to 3.642 million in the week ending May 15. The so-called continuing claims, which are reported with a one-week lag, covered the period during which the government surveyed households for May\u2019s employment report.<\/p>\n The decline strengthens expectations that hiring picked up this month, though raw material shortages across industries could be a constraint. The dearth of workers and scarcity of inputs were blamed for the modest 266,000 jobs created in April, a slowdown from the 770,000 added in March.<\/p>\n In a separate report on Thursday, the Commerce Department confirmed that gross domestic product increased at a 6.4% annualized rate last quarter. The unrevised estimate followed a 4.3% growth rate in the fourth quarter.<\/p>\n Before tax corporate profits slipped $0.2 billion after decreasing $31.4 billion in the October-December period. A rise in domestic nonfinancial corporation profits was offset by lower domestic financial corporation and international profits.<\/p>\n “Over the year, profits should be boosted more directly by services industries as we expect consumer spending to transition back to the much-larger services category,” said Jay Bryson, chief economist at Wells Fargo in Charlotte, North Carolina. (Graphic: GDP, )<\/p>\n The strong growth momentum held early in the second quarter, with another report from the Commerce Department showing orders for non-defense capital goods excluding aircraft, a closely watched proxy for business spending plans, jumped 2.3% in April.<\/p>\n These so-called core capital goods orders increased 1.6% in March. Shipments of core capital goods gained 0.9% after rising 1.5% in March. Core capital goods shipments are used to calculate equipment spending in the GDP measurement. (Graphic: Core capital goods, )<\/p>\n With households sitting on at least $2.3 trillion in excess savings, demand booming, inventories low and profits rebounding, businesses are likely to continue investing in equipment to boost production, supporting manufacturing.<\/p>\n \u201cSupply chain bottlenecks and shortages of certain materials are holding back some producers, but firms are clearly investing in increased capacity,\u201d said Chris Low, economist at FHN Financial in New York.<\/p>\nBACK AT WORK<\/h2>\n