{"id":120882,"date":"2021-09-03T15:11:22","date_gmt":"2021-09-03T15:11:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fin2me.com\/?p=120882"},"modified":"2021-09-03T15:11:22","modified_gmt":"2021-09-03T15:11:22","slug":"off-the-menu-uk-alfresco-dining-faces-autumn-dilemma","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fin2me.com\/business\/off-the-menu-uk-alfresco-dining-faces-autumn-dilemma\/","title":{"rendered":"Off the menu? UK alfresco dining faces autumn dilemma"},"content":{"rendered":"
Councils are considering whether to continue the emergency Covid measures for hospitality firms<\/p>\n
Last modified on Fri 3 Sep 2021 09.30 EDT<\/p>\n
It is mid-morning in London\u2019s Soho, and the outdoor tables at many cafes and restaurants are already buzzing with regulars.<\/p>\n
It is an alfresco scene that is set to change next month when Westminster council ends its scheme of evening road closures and pedestrianised streets that has turned parts of central London into a giant European-style outdoor bistro.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Sophie Hayes, a regular at the French-style cafe Maison Bertaux, has loved the move to dining in the fresh air. As has Bertie King, the assistant manager of the Ducksoup restaurant on nearby Dean Street, who says its outdoor tables have almost doubled the business\u2019s capacity.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe are wishing that it wasn\u2019t ending,\u201d she said. \u201cWe already can\u2019t have umbrellas and [after September] we can only have one table out front. We have spent a lot of money on heaters and brollies and outdoor tables. Some people aren\u2019t ready to sit inside yet.\u201d<\/p>\n
While outdoor dining has been popular with hospitality businesses and their clients, residents say the council must stick to its promise of ending the road closures this month. They say large-scale alfresco dining and drinking has created intolerable noise and disruption from revellers and by pushing businesses\u2019 deliveries and rubbish collections into the early hours of the morning.<\/p>\n
As autumn approaches, Soho\u2019s quandary is being repeated in towns and cities across the UK as councils, businesses and residents consider whether emergency measures to facilitate outdoor dining should continue.<\/p>\n
In March, the communities secretary, Robert Jenrick, announced he would extend temporary provisions on pavement licences, including lower fees and much shorter consultation periods, until September 2022 to help the hospitality industry recover.<\/p>\n
However, many councils did not consult with local people on the road closures and other emergency measures introduced to facilitate outdoor dining during the pandemic to help businesses not allowed to trade indoors, or barely able to do so because of the requirements of social distancing.<\/p>\n
With the arrival of autumn, Birmingham says it will be reviewing its temporary road closures and pavement widening on a case-by-case basis, suggesting plans to scale back on outdoor dining.<\/p>\n
Manchester, where 350 pavement licences have been granted by the council, is keeping some road closures \u2013 Thomas Street and part of Ducie Street in the Northern Quarter will be permanently closed to traffic. However, the pedestrianisation of nearby Stevenson Square, Shudehill and Withy Grove as well as the part pedestrianisation of Deansgate are subject to further public consultation.<\/p>\n
Sacha Lord, the night-time economy adviser for Greater Manchester, said: \u201cThese schemes were vital to the businesses who were trying to trade during the pandemic, and will continue to be imperative as the sector recovers.<\/p>\n
\u201cManchester\u2019s weather issues are well known however, and a move for permanent outdoor trading would be difficult to implement year round.\u201d<\/p>\n
However in Liverpool, Newcastle and parts of London including King\u2019s Cross, where 1,500 alfresco seats have sprung up since the start of the pandemic, the plan is to renew pavement licences to enable restaurants to trade outdoors into the winter.<\/p>\n
Harry Doyle, Liverpool council\u2019s cabinet member for culture and visitor economy, says its Liverpool Without Walls initiative, which generated almost \u00a39m of income for businesses that they would not otherwise have taken, will continue. <\/p>\n
\u201cThis sector is hugely important to the city and we are pleased to say we are in the process of renewing pavement licences to enable outlets to continue to welcome customers with their outdoor model.\u201d<\/p>\n
Newcastle city council, which has 151 premises with permission for pavement cafes, said it had no plans to prevent them from continuing to trade outdoors.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe increased number of pavement cafes in the city has been a real positive at what has been very difficult time for our hospitality trade,\u201d a spokesperson said.<\/p>\n
Westminster, which created more than 16,000 outdoor seats for the hospitality sector, says its road closures, which made space for additional outdoor dining in the streets of Marylebone, Covent Garden and St John\u2019s Wood as well as Soho, were always intended to be temporary. It says businesses can still apply for pavement licences on existing footways and it will consult with residents and businesses about longer-term schemes to facilitate additional outdoor dining.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhile the [road closure] schemes were extended three times, now is the point at which we need to consult residents on whether or not they should continue, and the colder and rainier months are the best time to do that,\u201d a spokesperson said.<\/p>\n
Tim Lord, the chair of the Soho Society, which represents local residents, says they are desperate for change: \u201cPeople quite like street dining. It is one thing during the day, but if you were here at two in the morning you would see something extraordinary. We have at least 2,000 additional people in the streets. It is meant to finish at 11pm but there is no mechanism to encourage people to go home.\u201d<\/p>\n
He says the takeover of the streets by restaurants and bars is a \u201cmassive transfer of a valuable public asset from shared public use to private commercial gain with no transparency on how the council decided to do that\u201d.<\/p>\n