Donald J. Trump has for decades trafficked in the language of vengeance, from his days as a New York developer vowing \u201can eye for an eye\u201d in the real estate business to ticking through an enemies ledger in 2022 as he sought to oust every last Republican who voted for his impeachment. \u201cFour down and six to go,\u201d he cheered in a statement as one went down to defeat.<\/p>\n
But even though payback has long been part of his public persona, Mr. Trump\u2019s speech on Saturday at the Conservative Political Action Conference was striking for how explicitly he signaled that any return trip to the White House would amount to a term of spite.<\/p>\n
\u201cIn 2016, I declared, \u2018I am your voice,\u2019\u201d Mr. Trump told the crowd in National Harbor, Md. \u201cToday, I add: I am your warrior. I am your justice. And for those who have been wronged and betrayed, I am your retribution.\u201d<\/p>\n
He repeated the phrase for emphasis: \u201cI am your retribution.\u201d<\/p>\n
Framing the 2024 election as a dire moment in an us-versus-them struggle \u2014 \u201cthe final battle,\u201d as he put it \u2014 Mr. Trump charged forward in an uncharted direction for American politics, talking openly about leveraging the power of the presidency for political reprisals.<\/p>\n
His menacing declaration landed differently in the wake of the pro-Trump mob\u2019s assault on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, in a last-ditch effort to keep him in power. The notion that Mr. Trump\u2019s supporters could be spurred to violence is no longer hypothetical, as it was in 2016 when he urged a rally audience to \u201cknock the crap out of\u201d hecklers. The attack on the Capitol underscored that his most fanatical followers took his falsehoods and claims of victimhood seriously \u2014 and were willing to act on them.<\/p>\n
While Mr. Trump has long walked up to a transgressive line, he has often managed to avoid unambiguously crossing it, leaving his intentions just uncertain enough to allow his supporters to say he is being mistreated or misinterpreted.<\/p>\n
Steven Cheung, a spokesman for Mr. Trump, said the speech was \u201ca call to political action to defeat the Democrats who have put their collective boot on the throats of Americans,\u201d adding, \u201cAnyone who thinks otherwise is either being disingenuous or is outright lying because they know President Trump continues to be a threat to the political establishment.\u201d<\/p>\n
But John Bolton, a national security adviser under Mr. Trump who later broke publicly with him, had little doubt what the former president meant on Saturday. \u201cI think he\u2019s talking about retribution he would exact on people who would cross him,\u201d said Mr. Bolton, who also served as ambassador to the United Nations. The reference was not about Mr. Trump\u2019s supporters, Mr. Bolton said, but about Mr. Trump himself.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt would be, first and foremost, getting back at the people he thinks deserve some kind of punishment for not doing what he tells them to do,\u201d Mr. Bolton said. \u201cAnd it\u2019s a big group of people.\u201d<\/p>\n
The race begins. <\/strong>Four years after a historically large number of candidates ran for president, the field for the 2024 campaign\u00a0is starting out small and is likely to be headlined by the same two men who ran last time: President Biden and former President Donald J. Trump. Here\u2019s who has entered the race so far, and who else might run:<\/span><\/p>\n Donald Trump. <\/strong>The former president is running to retake the office he lost in 2020. Though somewhat diminished in influence\u00a0within the Republican Party \u2014 and facing several legal investigations\u00a0\u2014 he retains a large and committed base of supporters, and he could be aided in the primary by multiple challengers splitting a limited anti-Trump vote.<\/span><\/p>\n Nikki Haley. <\/strong>The former governor of South Carolina and U.N. ambassador under Mr. Trump has presented herself as a member of \u201ca new generation of leadership\u201d\u00a0and emphasized her life experience as a daughter of Indian immigrants. She was long seen as a rising G.O.P. star but her allure in the party has declined\u00a0amid her on-again, off-again embrace of Mr. Trump.<\/span><\/p>\n Vivek Ramaswamy. <\/strong>The multimillionaire entrepreneur and author describes himself as \u201canti-woke\u201d and is known in right-wing circles for opposing corporate efforts to advance political, social and environmental causes. He has never held elected office and does not have the name recognition of most other G.O.P. contenders.<\/span><\/p>\n President Biden. <\/strong>While Mr. Biden has not formally declared his candidacy for a second term, and there has been much hand-wringing among Democrats\u00a0over whether he should seek re-election given\u00a0his age, he is widely expected to run. If he does, Mr. Biden\u2019s strategy\u00a0is to frame the race as a contest between a seasoned leader and a conspiracy-minded opposition.<\/span><\/p>\n Marianne Williamson. <\/strong>The self-help author and former spiritual adviser to Oprah Winfrey is the first Democrat to formally enter the race. Kicking off her second presidential campaign, Ms. Williamson called Mr. Biden a \u201cweak choice\u201d and said the party shouldn\u2019t fear a primary. Few in Democratic politics are taking her entry into the race seriously.<\/span><\/p>\n Others who are likely to run. <\/strong>Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida, former Vice President Mike Pence, former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Senator Tim Scott of South Carolina\u00a0and Gov. Chris Sununu of New Hampshire\u00a0are\u00a0seen as weighing Republican bids for the White House.<\/span><\/p>\n After Mr. Bolton\u2019s public falling-out with Mr. Trump, the former ambassador wrote a detailed book about his time working for the president, describing his behavior as \u201cobstruction of justice as a way of life\u201d and depicting Mr. Trump as endlessly transactional. When Mr. Trump could not persuade a federal judge to block the book\u2019s publication, he threatened Mr. Bolton on Twitter.<\/p>\n Mr. Trump\u2019s comments on Saturday were in his prepared remarks, rather than being off the cuff. His aides seemed pleased with the inherently sinister tone. The remarks were quickly packaged and pinned atop his campaign\u2019s \u201cWar Room\u201d Twitter page, and \u201cI am your retribution,\u201d in all capital letters, was turned into the subject line of a fund-raising email.<\/p>\n Mr. Trump\u2019s speech was laced with allusions to Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida, so far the chief threat to his winning another nomination. He referred, for instance, to \u201csome in our party\u201d who have been open to cutbacks in Social Security. \u201cI wonder who that might be,\u201d Mr. Trump mocked.<\/p>\n Casting himself as a \u201cwarrior\u201d was another reminder that Mr. Trump is generally determined to let no one \u2014 including a Florida governor fresh off clashes with Disney and the College Board \u2014 evince more strength than the former president in warring with the left and its perceived allies.<\/p>\n How Times reporters cover politics.<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0We rely on our journalists to be independent observers. So while Times staff members may vote, they are not allowed to endorse or campaign for candidates or political causes. This includes participating in marches or rallies in support of a movement or giving money to, or raising money for, any political candidate or election cause.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n Facing investigations in two states and in two cases overseen by the Justice Department, Mr. Trump repeatedly insisted that the judicial system should not be trusted, holding himself and his supporters up as the true arbiters of justice. Mr. Trump said the same day that he would not exit the presidential race if he were indicted.<\/p>\n Mr. Bolton pointed to another part of Mr. Trump\u2019s speech: \u201cThis is it. Either they win or we win. And if they win, we no longer have a country.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cI think that\u2019s also a signal that he\u2019s not going to accept a second defeat, the same way he didn\u2019t accept the first defeat,\u201d Mr. Bolton said of Mr. Trump\u2019s election lies. Mr. Bolton suggested Mr. Trump\u2019s efforts to stay in power were not a well-oiled plan, but a series of day-to-day impulses he was acting on. But what Mr. Trump is saying now, Mr. Bolton said, is different.<\/p>\n In essence, Mr. Bolton said, the former president is \u201cpretty much calling for something close to civil insurrection.\u201d<\/p>\n Mick Mulvaney, who served as Mr. Trump\u2019s acting chief of staff, saw the speech in terms of its potential to turn off general-election voters who rejected the former president in 2020.<\/p>\n \u201cIt\u2019s a great line for his hard-core supporters,\u201d said Mr. Mulvaney, who attended a recent donor retreat hosted by Mr. DeSantis. \u201cBut he just lost another two points with suburban women in the Midwest.\u201d<\/p>\n Planning is already underway for 2025 should Mr. Trump win the White House again. Advisers have discussed reimposing a Trump-era executive order, known as Schedule F, that would give the president vast power to replace what have traditionally been civil service workers embedded across the federal bureaucracy.<\/p>\n Mr. Trump alluded to those efforts on Saturday.<\/p>\n \u201cI will totally obliterate the deep state,\u201d he said, \u201cI will fire \u2026\u201d he went on, before being interrupted by applause and \u201cU.S.A.! U.S.A.!\u201d chants. \u201cI will fire the unelected bureaucrats and shadow forces who have weaponized our justice system like it has never been weaponized before.\u201d<\/p>\n Mr. Trump has for decades sought to play the role of victim and vowed vengeance on those who cross him, beginning in 1973 with the first Justice Department investigation into what it said were his family business\u2019s racially discriminatory housing practices, a case he eventually settled. He cried foul in August when the F.B.I. searched his private club, Mar-a-Lago, for classified documents that he had not turned over despite a grand jury subpoena. And he has railed against that investigation and the state inquiries in New York and Georgia, denouncing both prosecutors in those states \u2014 who are Black \u2014 as \u201cracist\u201d for looking into him.<\/p>\n Jason Stanley, a Yale professor who wrote the book \u201cHow Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them,\u201d said the danger in undermining trust in the rule of law was that it left little alternative to overthrowing or overturning the system itself.<\/p>\n \u201cThis is the final battle,\u201d Mr. Trump said on Saturday. \u201cThey know it, I know it, you know it, everybody knows it.\u201d<\/p>\n Dr. Stanley said that such language was all the more notable given the context of Jan. 6. \u201cHe\u2019s saying it\u2019s a war,\u201d he said. \u201cThere is not law versus chaos, there is just him versus his enemies, your<\/em> enemies.\u201d<\/p>\n He added <\/strong>bluntly, \u201cTrump engages in fascist rhetoric.\u201d<\/p>\n Last month, Hugh Hewitt, the conservative radio host, asked Mr. Trump directly if he would \u201cuse the powers of the presidency to punish people who punished you.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cNo, I wouldn\u2019t do that,\u201d Mr. Trump said, before indulging the topic further. \u201cI would be entitled to a revenge tour, if you want to know the truth,\u201d he said, \u201cbut I wouldn\u2019t do that.\u201d<\/p>\n Demanding unconditional loyalty \u2014 and promising retaliation if he doesn\u2019t get it \u2014 has been so much a fixture of his career that former employees at his company often say the public still doesn\u2019t fully understand what he is capable of.<\/p>\n \u201cIf given the opportunity, I will get even with some people that were disloyal to me,\u201d Mr. Trump told Charlie Rose in a November 1992 interview about those who had crossed him during his recent financial struggles.<\/p>\n One dissident member of a board he dealt with, Mr. Trump said, was finally removed \u201cafter being hit over the head with a cannon.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cWhat was the cannon?\u201d Mr. Rose asked.<\/p>\n \u201cThe cannon,\u201d Mr. Trump replied, \u201cwas me.\u201d<\/p>\n