President Biden and congressional leaders will resume face-to-face talks on Tuesday to avert a government default, with the White House expressing cautious optimism as the contours of a possible deal began to come into focus.<\/p>\n
With time running out to strike a deal to raise the debt limit, broad areas of negotiation have emerged, including fixed caps on federal spending, reclaiming unspent funds designated for the Covid-19 emergency, stiffer work requirements for federal benefits and expedited permitting rules for energy projects.<\/p>\n
\u201cI remain optimistic because I\u2019m a congenital optimist,\u201d Mr. Biden told reporters on Sunday in Rehoboth Beach, Del. He added, \u201cI really think there\u2019s a desire on their part, as well as ours, to reach an agreement, and I think we\u2019ll be able to do it.\u201d<\/p>\n
Still, on Monday, Speaker Kevin McCarthy said the two sides remained \u201cfar apart.\u201d<\/p>\n
The Treasury Department has warned that the United States could be unable to pay its bills by June 1 if it does not raise the debt limit, which caps how much money the country can borrow. That $31.4 trillion limit was hit on Jan. 19, and the Treasury Department has been using accounting maneuvers to keep paying America\u2019s bills.<\/p>\n
Republicans have said they want to cut federal spending before lifting the ceiling, but Mr. Biden has maintained that negotiating over cuts must not be a condition for raising the limit and avoiding what could be a catastrophic default.<\/p>\n
Economists on Wall Street and in the White House say a prolonged default could obliterate jobs and lead the country into recession.<\/p>\n
Mr. Biden, who departs on Wednesday for Japan to attend the Group of 7 meeting, confirmed on Monday that he would meet with Mr. McCarthy on Tuesday.<\/p>\n
The two sides had their first face-to-face meeting at the White House last Tuesday, but it ended without a deal. They had been set to meet again last Thursday, but that session was postponed to allow staff members more time to speak in detail.<\/p>\n
People familiar with the negotiations cast the decision to postpone that meeting as a positive development, one that would give staff members more time to make progress.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe conversations are constructive between all of the parties,\u201d said Wally Adeyemo, the deputy Treasury secretary.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe United States has never defaulted on its debt, and we can\u2019t,\u201d Mr. Adeyemo said. \u201cBecause defaulting on our debt isn\u2019t just about financial markets. It\u2019s about paying our Social Security recipients, it\u2019s about paying our troops, it\u2019s about paying the men and women who are working the border today.\u201d<\/p>\n
Biden administration officials have said they will not accept any deal that rolls back the president\u2019s signature legislative achievements, particularly on climate change. They want Republicans to drop certain provisions in the debt limit bill that passed the House last month.<\/p>\n
That measure is dead on arrival in the Democratic-led Senate, but the details are a signal of the Republicans\u2019 negotiating position with the White House.<\/p>\n
The bill would make able-bodied adults without dependents who receive both federal food assistance and Medicaid benefits subject to work requirements until they are 55 years old, raising the current age from 49. It also seeks to close a loophole that Republicans have claimed is abused by states, which allows officials to exempt food assistance recipients from work requirements.<\/p>\n
Asked if he was open to tougher work requirements for aid programs, Mr. Biden said over the weekend that had voted for such measures as a senator, \u201cbut for Medicaid it\u2019s a different story.\u201d<\/p>\n
Michael Kikukawa, a White House spokesman, said Mr. Biden \u201chas been clear that he will not accept proposals that take away people\u2019s health coverage.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThe president has been clear he will not accept policies that push Americans into poverty,\u201d Mr.\u00a0Kikukawa said.<\/p>\n
Conservatives had initially pushed to tighten those work requirements even further, but more mainstream Republicans in competitive districts balked.<\/p>\n
Catie Edmondson contributed reporting.<\/p>\n