{"id":133903,"date":"2023-08-08T10:42:49","date_gmt":"2023-08-08T10:42:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fin2me.com\/?p=133903"},"modified":"2023-08-08T10:42:49","modified_gmt":"2023-08-08T10:42:49","slug":"poll-do-you-have-faith-in-rishi-sunaks-plan-for-migration","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fin2me.com\/politics\/poll-do-you-have-faith-in-rishi-sunaks-plan-for-migration\/","title":{"rendered":"POLL: Do you have faith in Rishi Sunak’s plan for migration?"},"content":{"rendered":"
Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg has said that the cost of the Government\u2019s plans to send migrants to Ascension Island would be \u00a31million per asylum seeker.<\/p>\n
Ministers are looking to revive plans to set up a processing centre for migrants on the British overseas territory, located in the South Atlantic, if the Rwanda policy fails.<\/p>\n
The GB News presenter and former Cabinet minister said on Monday: \u201cI was involved in some of the discussions looking at this whilst I was a member of the Government and unfortunately it would cost at least a million pounds per person you sent there to do it.<\/p>\n
\u201cYou\u2019ve got to send out Portakabin residences for your builders, then you\u2019ve got builders who have to live there whilst they\u2019re doing the building, then you have to build the premises for the migrants to live in, then you\u2019ve got to persuade people that they want to go and live on Ascension Island for long periods to run the centre.<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd the costs just went up and up and up and up. And that\u2019s why when I was involved in the discussions, it was just thought to be impossibly expensive to do.\u201d<\/p>\n
READ MORE: <\/strong> Illegal migrants could be sent to Ascension Island in ‘plan B’ if Rwanda fails<\/strong><\/p>\n IF YOU CAN’T SEE THE POLL ABOVE, CLICK HERE<\/strong><\/p>\n The use of the volcanic island, located 4,000 miles from the UK, is part of the Government\u2019s \u201cPlan B\u201d contingencies under consideration if the Rwanda deportation scheme, which was ruled \u201cunlawful\u201d, fails to be appealed in the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n The use of UK territories would only be for processing asylum seekers rather than as a permanent destination.<\/p>\n As of Tuesday morning, more than 18,400 Express.co.uk readers are divided on sending migrants to Ascension Island with 54 percent against the policy compared with 46 percent in favour \u2013 share your thoughts in our poll.<\/p>\n Join our free WhatsApp community for the latest politics news<\/strong><\/p>\n Talks about reviving the policy which was rejected three years ago come as the Government marks \u201csmall boats week\u201d with a series of announcements on the migrant crisis.<\/p>\n More than 15,000 people have crossed the English Channel in small boats so far this year, with Prime Minister Rishi Sunak pledging to \u201cstop the boats\u201d.<\/p>\n So what about YOU? Do you have faith in Rishi Sunak’s plan for migration? Vote in our poll and join the debate in the comment section below.<\/strong><\/p>\n We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info<\/p>\n<\/p>\n